Travel plan and transport

What is being proposed?

The application describes the purpose of a Travel Plan as:

A Travel Plan is a package of measures tailored to the individual needs of a Site. The key aim of a Travel Plan is to inform residents (and visitors where possible) of the alternatives to driving their cars to the Site, to increase awareness of and promote greener, cleaner modes of travel, and to reduce the overall number of single-occupancy car trips to and from the proposed development. This Travel Plan relates to residents and visitors to the Site; however, it is noted that although visitors can be influenced to some degree by the Travel Plan the focus will mainly be on resident travel behaviours as there is more potential to change travel patterns.

The plan is not fixed, and is intended to be monitored and updated “through a series of resident travel surveys”.

It also includes a description of how parking spaces will be allocated within the proposed development.

Comments

Parking

The planning application says:

Car and cycle parking will be provided as per the adopted standards in the Test Valley District Council Local Plan, Policy T2.

The application also says “It is considered that the proposed development complies with all the relevant transport policies and adopted parking requirements listed above.” But does it?

The application does not comply with the Chilbolton Neighbourhood Development Plan which says:

2.4.2 Policy HD5 states the following parking standards should be used:

  • 1 bed - 2 spaces per unit
  • 2 and 3 bed -3 spaces per unit
  • 4+ bed – 4 spaces per unit

Therefore to comply with CNDP, there should be 234 parking spaces for the site rather than 203 parking spaces referred to in the application.

Walking opportunities

Figure 3-1 of the Travel Plan shows walking opportunities from the Site:

Within a 15-minute walk of the Site a number of amenities can be accessed including:

  • Chilbolton Village Hall
  • Chilbolton Village Shop and Tea Room
  • Post Office
  • Abbots Mitre Pub
  • Bus Stops on Village Street and Branksome Avenue
  • Chilbolton Recreation Ground

A number of these properties will be for older people, will they really be able to walk to all of these destinations in 15 minutes? Will residents be able to walk safely to these destinations where there are no joined up pavements, and narrow, winding roads?

Public Transport

Most of the information in the planning application’s Travel Plan describing bus routes is incorrect.

Tim McDonnell pointed out these errors:

There is no scheduled bus service. There is a Test Valley ‘connection service’ which operates 7 passenger seat MPVs on a demand led basis from 7am to 7pm which would be completely overwhelmed by the number of people in this proposed developed. It offers no useful connection for commuting purposes, is unreliable, is not practical for families, especially those with dogs and pets (which are not permitted to travel) - and does not connect with wider Hampshire or South East travel infrastructure in a planned, reliable or sustainable way. The Test Valley connect service does NOT connect with Winchester or Romsey station as stated. It is for North Test Valley only and offers a connection simply to Andover station if one can make a booking and get space and doesn’t need to be in London or anywhere else for community or other purpose early or late, Additionally, the rules of this service note ’each passenger can make up to 12 trips a week (two singles per day of service)’ and ‘Journeys are on a first-come, first-served basis, so please bear this in mind when booking’. This is not comparable to a bus which has no such restrictions or reliability concerns (it may simply not be available unlike a timetabled service) and it is not possible to rely solely on this service for work and leisure.

Comment published 17 Nov 2025

How many people would be prepared to cycle 38 minutes to go to Andover railway station, in the dark on unlit roads? How many residents of Chilbolton would be capable of doing so?

The absence of public transport is caught by Peter Hatter:
  • Chilbolton has virtually no functional public transport.
  • The nearest railway station is miles away, and bus services are non-existent, leaving residents entirely dependent on private vehicles.
  • Adding 75 new homes would lock new residents into car dependency, directly contradicting goals for sustainable transport and further exacerbating the village’s already severe traffic and parking problems.
Comment published 21 Nov 2025

Sustainability of Site Location

The application says

It should be noted HCC School Travel Policy states 2 miles (3.2km) is an acceptable walk distance for pupils age 8 or below, and 3 miles (4.8km) for pupils aged 8-16.

The distance of two miles may be an acceptable distance for under 8’s to walk to school, however walking from Chilbolton to Wherwell school involves walking along 60mph narrow roads during a very busy part of the day which is totally unrealistic. Taking the route across the Common is no better as it takes at least 45 minutes to complete the walk to school. This is not a realistic expectation.

Traffic Surveys

Traffic surveys were undertaken in September 2025 of the highway network surrounding the Site to understand existing traffic flows and to inform the highway impact assessment.

These surveys were not thorough enough. They only took place for 1 week and only near the proposed entrance to the site.

No surveys took place to measure the flow of traffic along the rest of Drove Road, Station Road, Branksome Avenue, Coley Lane or Village Street.

All off these roads would be used for residents of the new homes to access routes out of Chilbolton.

It has been estimated that there would be an extra 600 vehicle movements per day from 75 new homes. Further traffic surveys must be conducted to measure the existing traffic flows along these roads. This would give a much clearer picture of the effect of an additional 75 homes on our village roads.

It is already dangerous for road users such as pedestrians, cyclists and horse riders on our narrow, winding roads, with few pavements.

As Jeremy Buttery points out, being a pedestrian in Chilbolton can be a frightening experience:

I walk my dog every day along Coley Lane and usually pass other pedestrians on the road as it is the only access route to the safe recreation zones in both West Down and Cow Common. At least twice a week I am frightened by passing road traffic leaving less than metre from me, particularly large lorries and delivery vans. The current road network barely meets the existing needs, so I am incredulous at the concept of increasing traffic by up to 20% without any improvement to road infrastructure or capacity.

Comment published 24 Nov 2025